Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5827) to advance bipartisan, common sense solutions.

This resolution establishes the procedural framework for House consideration of H.R. 5827, a bill described as advancing bipartisan, common sense solutions. The resolution functions as a special rule that governs floor debate, amendment procedures, and voting requirements for the underlying legislation. It creates an expedited consideration process that limits debate to one hour, restricts amendments to only the last one submitted, and waives all points of order against the bill's provisions. The resolution also mandates prompt transmission of the bill to the Senate following House passage, ensuring swift legislative action. This procedural vehicle reflects the House leadership's determination to move H.R. 5827 through the chamber with minimal delay and limited opportunities for modification.

The resolution establishes a streamlined consideration process through several key procedural mechanisms. Section 1 provides that upon adoption of the resolution, the House shall immediately proceed to consideration of H.R. 5827, with only the last amendment submitted being considered as adopted. This unusual provision effectively limits the amendment process to a single final amendment in the nature of a substitute. All points of order against provisions in the bill as amended are waived, removing procedural obstacles that might otherwise delay or derail consideration. The resolution orders the previous question on the bill and any further amendments to final passage without intervening motions, preventing dilatory tactics. Debate on the amendment in the nature of a substitute is limited to one hour, equally divided between Representative Suozzi of New York and an opponent or their designees. One motion to recommit is permitted, preserving the minority's traditional right to offer a final amendment. Section 2 suspends the application of clause 1(c) of rule XIX and clause 8 of rule XX specifically for consideration of H.R. 5827, waiving normal procedural requirements. Section 3 mandates that the Clerk transmit a message to the Senate confirming House passage within one calendar day after the bill passes.

Implementation responsibility falls primarily to the House leadership and the Clerk of the House. The resolution requires the House to proceed immediately to consideration upon adoption, placing the burden on the Speaker and Majority Leader to schedule floor time accordingly. The Clerk of the House bears specific responsibility under Section 3 to transmit a message to the Senate no later than one calendar day after passage, creating a mandatory deadline for inter-chamber communication. Representative Suozzi of New York is designated as the primary manager of debate time for the amendment in the nature of a substitute, with authority to control thirty minutes of debate or designate another member to do so. The minority opposition is granted equal time control. The resolution does not establish new funding mechanisms or reporting requirements, as it is purely procedural in nature. Enforcement of the resolution's provisions occurs through the normal operation of House rules and the authority of the presiding officer to recognize members and rule on procedural matters.

The resolution's impact is primarily procedural rather than substantive, affecting how the House considers H.R. 5827 rather than creating direct beneficiaries or imposing costs. Members of the House are the primary stakeholders affected, with the resolution significantly limiting their ability to offer amendments or engage in extended debate. The restriction to only the last submitted amendment creates a strategic dynamic where members must carefully time their amendment submissions. The waiver of all points of order removes protections that might otherwise allow members to challenge provisions that violate House rules or budget requirements. The expedited timeline and mandatory Senate transmission within one calendar day creates pressure for rapid action and reduces opportunities for deliberation. The resolution does not contain cost estimates or sunset provisions, as it expires upon completion of consideration of H.R. 5827. The administrative burden is minimal, limited to the Clerk's obligation to transmit the bill promptly. The expected outcome is swift House passage of H.R. 5827 with limited amendments and debate, followed by immediate Senate consideration.

The resolution derives its authority from Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution, which grants each House of Congress the power to determine the rules of its proceedings. Special rules like this resolution are standard exercises of the House's constitutional rulemaking authority, typically reported by the Committee on Rules and adopted by majority vote. The resolution explicitly modifies the application of House rules by waiving clause 1(c) of rule XIX, which governs germaneness requirements, and clause 8 of rule XX, which addresses voting procedures. The waiver of all points of order against bill provisions represents a significant exercise of the House's authority to suspend its own rules for specific legislation. This resolution does not create statutory law or regulatory requirements, nor does it preempt state or local law. As a procedural resolution governing internal House operations, it is not subject to presidential signature or veto and does not create rights enforceable through judicial review. The resolution's legal effect is limited to the consideration of H.R. 5827 and expires upon completion of that consideration.

The resolution raises several procedural and political concerns that may generate controversy. The limitation on amendments to only the last one submitted represents an unusual restriction that significantly curtails the deliberative process and member participation. This provision may be challenged as undermining the House's traditional role as a deliberative body where members can offer and debate multiple amendments. The blanket waiver of all points of order removes important procedural safeguards that normally protect against violations of House rules, budget requirements, and legislative standards. This could allow provisions that would otherwise be subject to challenge to proceed without scrutiny. The expedited timeline with only one hour of debate may be criticized as insufficient for thorough consideration of complex legislation, particularly if H.R. 5827 addresses significant policy matters. The mandatory one-day transmission deadline to the Senate creates artificial urgency that may limit the House's ability to reconsider or correct errors. Opposition arguments will likely focus on the resolution's restriction of minority rights and reduction of transparency in the legislative process. The suspension of clause 1(c) of rule XIX and clause 8 of rule XX may allow consideration of non-germane amendments or alter normal voting procedures in ways that disadvantage the minority. Implementation challenges include managing the unusual amendment process and ensuring compliance with the tight transmission deadline. The resolution's approach may set precedent for future restrictions on deliberation and amendment rights.