1. United States
2. N.J.
3. Letter

At this point, the pattern is undeniable: bipartisan legislation—crafted through compromise, negotiation, and the very mechanisms the Constitution demands—is being routinely derailed for the personal and political convenience of one man. This is not governance. It is obstruction in service of ego. The Constitution was deliberately designed to prevent unilateral control. It requires friction, debate, and cooperation across factions. Bipartisanship is not a weakness—it is the system working as intended. When those efforts are repeatedly overridden, sabotaged, or dismissed outright, it is not merely political disagreement; it is a direct assault on the constitutional order itself. A president who rejects bipartisan solutions not on merit, but because they do not center his power or narrative, is not acting in the interest of the nation. He is placing himself above the system. That is the behavior of a monarch, not an elected official. And let’s be clear: we are dangerously close to normalizing it. If Congress allows this pattern to continue—if you continue to produce good-faith, cross-party solutions only to watch them be discarded without consequence—you are not functioning as a co-equal branch. You are enabling the erosion of your own authority. This is no longer about policy differences. It is about whether the United States remains a constitutional republic or drifts further toward rule by one. Bipartisan governance is the blueprint. Undermining it for personal power is a betrayal of that blueprint—and of the country. If the president refuses to uphold the structure he swore to protect, then Congress must act. Not symbolically. Not performatively. Decisively. Remove him. Or accept that you are complicit in what comes next.