1. United States
2. N.J.
3. Letter

You cannot claim to uphold accountability while ignoring the glaring risks surrounding Elon Musk. He has already been found liable for misleading investors in connection with Twitter—a clear demonstration of his willingness to distort facts when it serves his interests. That alone should have triggered serious scrutiny. Instead, he was allowed proximity to projects and systems tied to massive financial flows and, in some cases, sensitive user data. What exactly occurred during his involvement with Dogecoin initiatives and related financial influence? What safeguards were in place to ensure that access to user data, market-moving communications, or federally adjacent funding streams was not abused? And why has Congress failed to demand transparent answers? This is not about personality or politics—it is about risk. When an individual with a documented record of misleading investors is allowed influence over platforms, markets, and potentially sensitive information, the opportunity for abuse is not hypothetical—it is inevitable without oversight. If there is nothing to hide, then a full investigation will confirm that. If there is something to uncover, then every day of inaction increases the scale of potential harm. Congress has the authority to subpoena records, compel testimony, and trace financial and data access pathways. Use it. Failure to investigate is not restraint—it is negligence. And if further misconduct is later exposed, your inaction will not be seen as oversight. It will be seen as complicity.