1. United States
2. Ariz.
3. Letter

The proposed House Bill 6658 raises serious concerns about discriminatory practices and potential harm to vulnerable children. Defining a person's gender based solely on their reproductive anatomy disregards the complex realities of gender identity and expression. This could lead to denying appropriate medical care and support for transgender and gender non-conforming youth, putting their well-being at risk. Additionally, prohibiting adoption entities from considering a parent's willingness to support a child's gender identity could result in placements that are detrimental to the child's mental health and development. Rather than imposing rigid and unscientific definitions, policies regarding adoption and foster care should prioritize the best interests of the child. This includes ensuring placements in loving, affirming homes that provide a supportive environment for the child to thrive. Extensive research shows that family acceptance and access to appropriate care are critical for the well-being of transgender and gender-diverse youth. I urge you to consider the potential negative consequences of House Bill 6658 on vulnerable children and families. Policies should be grounded in evidence-based practices that promote the safety, health, and welfare of all children, regardless of their gender identity or expression. A more inclusive and affirmative approach is needed to protect the rights and dignity of all families.