1. United States
2. N.C.
3. Letter

The anti-abortion movement is emboldened and determined to enact an aggressive agenda that would severely restrict reproductive rights, particularly access to abortion pills which currently account for two-thirds of abortions in the United States. Groups like Students for Life of America are pushing for federal legislation to ban medication abortion outright, prohibit telehealth abortion services, and require complex disposal of fetal remains in a misguided effort to protect water supplies. There are also concerning proposals to reinterpret outdated laws like the Comstock Act to create de facto national abortion bans without Congressional approval. With a new administration taking office, these groups see a prime opportunity to capitalize on their anti-abortion agenda through administrative actions like reversing FDA approval of abortion pills or redefining federal agency authority over regulations. Their long-term goal is establishing fetal personhood which would grant embryos full legal rights, outlawing abortion and potentially impacting fertility treatments. Voters have demonstrated mixed views, with some states amending constitutions to protect abortion rights while others embrace severe restrictions. Protecting reproductive freedom and access to essential healthcare services like abortion cannot be treated as a partisan issue. Women's fundamental rights over their own bodies and medical decisions are at stake. Substantial policy changes that impact millions must be guided by science, data, and the will of the people rather than driven by ideological agendas. A course correction is urgently needed to safeguard these constitutionally protected personal liberties.