1. United States
2. Utah
3. Letter

S. 4127, the Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2024, raises concerns about potential infringement on freedom of speech. While addressing antisemitism is a valid goal, defining it based on a particular organization's criteria risks stifling legitimate criticism and debate. The Jewish community is diverse, and equating all Jews with the policies of the Israeli government is an oversimplification that can promote further division. I urge you to carefully consider the implications of enshrining a specific definition of antisemitism into law. It is crucial to strike a balance between combating hate and preserving the fundamental right to free expression, even on controversial topics. Representing the interests of all constituents, including those who may disagree with Israeli policies, is essential in a pluralistic society. Rather than relying on a single, partisan definition, I propose exploring comprehensive strategies that bring communities together, foster greater understanding, and address antisemitism through education and open dialogue. Hate should be confronted, but not at the expense of curtailing free speech or marginalizing dissenting voices. An inclusive approach that respects diverse perspectives is vital for a just and equitable resolution.