1. United States
2. Fla.
3. Letter

The NORRA of 2025 would drastically limit the ability of federal courts to issue injunctions, a crucial tool for protecting constitutional rights and holding the government accountable. This legislation poses a severe threat to the system of checks and balances by undermining the judiciary's authority. It is imperative that this bill is rejected to preserve the separation of powers and safeguard the rule of law. Injunctive relief allows courts to temporarily halt harmful government actions until their legality can be fully adjudicated. By effectively eliminating this power except in extremely narrow circumstances, the NORRA would deprive citizens of a vital means to seek redress for constitutional violations. This represents an unacceptable erosion of civil liberties and due process. Furthermore, the bill unwisely constrains the courts' discretion by mandating strict criteria for multi-state injunctions against the executive branch. Such a one-size-fits-all approach fails to account for the nuances of each case and the need for judicial independence. The bill inappropriately injects political considerations into a process that should be guided solely by constitutional principles and the pursuit of justice. In light of these significant concerns over the NORRA's devastating impact on the federal judiciary and the system of checks and balances, it is imperative that this legislation is rejected. Preserving unfettered access to injunctive relief is essential to upholding constitutional rights and governmental accountability.