1. United States
2. Ore.
3. Letter

I am writing to you as a concerned Oregon resident regarding statements made by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. about creating a registry for autistic individuals, and to inquire about what measures Oregon's leadership is taking to protect neurodivergent Oregonians from such potentially harmful federal policies. Recent statements by Mr. Kennedy suggesting that autism is something that "destroys families" and should be "eradicated" fundamentally mischaracterize neurodivergence. Autism is not a disease but a neurotype - a different, equally valid way that some human brains function. Many autistic Oregonians are valuable, contributing members of our communities who thrive despite systems not designed with their needs in mind. History has taught us painful lessons about the dangers of categorizing and listing people based on neurological or physical differences. During the Holocaust, individuals with disabilities were among the first targeted by Nazi policies, initially under the guise of "treatment" before becoming subjects of horrific medical experimentation. While I do not know if they have equivalent intentions, the historical precedent should give us all pause when considering any policy that singles out individuals based on neurological differences. I am deeply concerned about the practical implications such policies could have on Oregon families: Parents fearing inclusion on such a registry may avoid seeking diagnoses and necessary services for their children. This avoidance will likely result in children not receiving appropriate educational accommodations and medical support. Our state's academic performance, already facing challenges, could suffer further as more children with unaddressed neurodevelopmental needs struggle in classroom environments. These concerns are compounded by recent reductions in school support staff, which further limits resources for neurodivergent students. I would appreciate knowing: What position has your office taken regarding these proposed policies? What specific protections can Oregon implement to shield its neurodivergent citizens from potentially discriminatory federal policies? How will you ensure that Oregon families feel safe seeking appropriate medical and educational support for neurodivergent children? I believe Oregon should be a leader in protecting the rights and dignity of all its citizens, including those with different neurological makeups. I look forward to hearing what concrete steps you and your colleagues are taking to address these concerns.