1. United States
2. Ohio
3. Letter

I am writing to voice my strong opposition to HB 249, the 'Indecent Exposure Modernization Act.' While the bill is framed as protecting children, its current language is dangerously vague and represents a significant overreach of state power into the lives of Ohio families and small businesses. First, HB 249 is a violation of Parental Rights. For years, this legislature has argued that parents—not the state—should be the primary decision-makers for their children. This bill flips that script, allowing the government to dictate which cultural performances are appropriate and overriding a parent's right to curate their own child's upbringing. Second, it is a Fiscal and Constitutional Liability. Similar laws in other states have already been struck down by federal courts for being unconstitutionally vague and violating the First Amendment. If passed, HB 249 will trigger immediate, expensive lawsuits that Ohio taxpayers will be forced to fund. We should be investing in infrastructure and education, not defending legally illiterate legislation in court. Finally, it threatens Ohio’s Economy. The vague definitions in this bill put our arts, tourism, and festival industries at risk of selective prosecution, which will drive major events and revenue away from our state. I urge you to protect Ohio’s reputation and the rights of its citizens by voting NO on HB 249. Please focus on the real issues facing our communities rather than micromanaging the wardrobes of performers and the choices of parents.