1. United States
2. Minn.
3. Letter

I am writing to express concern about recent efforts and proposals to place President Donald Trump's signature on U.S. currency. This would represent a significant break from long-standing U.S. law and tradition. Federal law has historically prohibited depicting living individuals on U.S. currency, reflecting a deliberate effort by the founders to distinguish our republic from monarchies and personality-driven systems of government.  Recent proposals, including adding his signature that appears to be happening, challenge both the spirit and, in some cases, the letter of these rules. It also misrepresents the money as someone being provided by the president instead of the people of this nation.  While some have argued there may be legal pathways in limited cases, experts have raised serious concerns that such actions could violate existing statutes or undermine established norms.  Beyond legality, this issue raises broader concerns about precedent. U.S. currency has historically honored individuals only after their passing, ensuring that recognition is based on enduring legacy rather than current political power. Moving away from that standard risks politicizing national symbols that are meant to unify, not divide. I respectfully urge you to: • Oppose any action that would allow a living president or his signature to appear on U.S. currency • Support maintaining existing legal protections and traditions governing U.S. currency design • Reinforce the principle that national symbols should remain nonpartisan and rooted in long-standing democratic norms This is not about any one individual, it is about preserving institutional guardrails and the integrity of shared national symbols.