1. United States
2. N.C.
3. Letter

The President's cabinet nominations raise concerns about his commitment to appointing qualified professionals to critically important roles. For example, naming RFK Jr., a vocal vaccine skeptic with no medical background, to lead the Department of Health and Human Services threatens public trust in vital health agencies and programs. Similarly, selecting Pete Hegseth, a television host with no relevant experience, as Defense Secretary during active military conflicts seems ill-advised. While the President has wide latitude in making appointments, these picks appear to prioritize political allegiance over substantive expertise and judgment. Key cabinet positions demand individuals with appropriate credentials who can competently steward national priorities like public health, military readiness, and foreign policy. Unqualified loyalists in sensitive roles risk undermining the government's ability to serve the national interest effectively. The administration should reconsider these unorthodox nominations in favor of accomplished professionals with applicable skills and experience to handle such weighty responsibilities. Cabinet leaders must inspire confidence in their judgment and capabilities across the political spectrum. Cronyism erodes that vital public trust in foundational institutions. I urge a more judicious approach to vetting qualified candidates able to admirably fulfill these crucial duties on behalf of all Americans.