1. United States
2. N.C.
3. Letter

This proposed legislation seeks to pathologize political dissent and criticism towards a president by labeling it as a mental illness. Such an approach raises significant concerns about infringing on the fundamental rights of free speech and freedom of expression. Attempting to medicalize opposition to political figures or their policies through a government-funded study could have a chilling effect on robust public discourse, which is vital for a healthy democracy. Rather than engaging in partisan attempts to discredit or delegitimize those with differing political views, efforts should be made to foster an environment where diverse perspectives can be expressed and debated openly without fear of being labeled as mentally ill. A pluralistic society thrives on the free exchange of ideas, even those that may be critical or unfavorable towards those in power. I urge you to reconsider this misguided proposal and instead focus on measures that bring people together, promote unity, and strengthen the democratic principles upon which our nation was founded. Seeking to medicalize political opposition is a dangerous path that undermines the very fabric of our civil liberties.