1. United States
2. Nev.
3. Letter

I’m writing to strongly oppose Section 70302 of H.R.1, which recently passed the House of Representatives. This provision severely undermines the ability of federal courts to enforce injunctions and temporary restraining orders (TROs) when no security bond has been posted under Rule 65(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. I urge you to ensure this section is removed in the Senate. This policy would have devastating consequences for domestic violence survivors, who often rely on TROs to protect themselves from abusers. Courts frequently waive the bond requirement in these cases due to victims’ limited resources. Under this provision, a victim’s abuser could violate a restraining order without fear of enforcement via contempt simply because the victim could not afford a bond. This is not only dangerous — it is unconscionable. Furthermore, this provision appears tailored to shield powerful individuals like Donald Trump, who is currently subject to multiple injunctions and court orders. If enacted, this section could block enforcement of those orders retroactively, setting a troubling precedent that the wealthy and politically connected are above the law. Finally, this section has no place in a reconciliation bill. Under the Byrd Rule, provisions must have a primary budgetary impact. Section 70302 is clearly a policy maneuver targeting judicial authority, not a spending or revenue issue. It should be ruled out of order and removed from any final legislation. I ask you to stand up for judicial independence, vulnerable communities, and the integrity of our legislative process. Please publicly oppose and vote to strip Section 70302 from H.R.1.