The House Must Impeach (Again)
The killing of Soleimani showed us a new side of a criminal president
In the immediate aftermath of the drone strike that killed Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, the White House has argued that the strike was necessary because there was “specific information on an imminent threat, and those threats included attacks on U.S. embassies.” [Emphasis added]
That phrase “imminent threat” matters here. It triggers special rules in both U.S. and international law. In both cases, an imminent threat justifies the use of military force without declaration or authorization. That’s important because the United States didn’t declare war on Iran nor did the U.S. Congress authorize President Trump to use military force against Iran.
If there wasn’t an imminent threat, Trump’s targeting of Qasem Soleimani is in violation of U.S. law, international law, and a war crime.
But the imminent threat that the White House claims prompted the attack doesn’t seem to exist. The members of Congress — both Republican and Democratic — who receive the most detailed national security briefings available to civilians have seen no mention of any intelligence suggesting any imminent attack on a U.S. embassy, base, or other facility.
President Trump has suggested there was a plot underway to target four embassies, but he seems to be the only member of the administration willing to commit to anything so specific. Last week, Secretary Pompeo described the situation with considerably less specificity, stating that “we don’t know precisely when, and we don’t know precisely where.”
Sunday, Secretary Esper said that he “didn’t see” the threat described by the President while describing “exquisite intelligence” provided to the Gang of Eight.
Esper: “Well, the President didn’t say there was a tangible—he didn’t cite a specific piece of evidence. What he says probably—he believed, could have been—“— Resistbot (@resistbot) January 13, 2020
“Are you saying there wasn’t one?”
“I didn’t see one with regard to four embassies.” pic.twitter.com/aRHJUQbQeI
So far no one in the Gang of Eight has corroborated Esper’s claims, Rep. Schiff called it, “plain wrong.”
“He said the intelligence was exquisite, and it was incredibly detailed. Do you quibble with his characterization of what you were told?”— Resistbot (@resistbot) January 12, 2020
Schiff: “I don't quibble with it. I think it's just plain wrong.” pic.twitter.com/YVGnZqoJes
Without knowledge of “when” or “where”, the attack on Soleimani can neither be justified as a response to an imminent threat nor credibly claim to prevent any sort of attack in a general planning stage. Without a “when” or “where,” Soleimani’s killing is a political assassination, pure and simple, undertaken to assuage the ego or boost the political fortunes of an increasingly dangerous and unhinged President.
Sen. Lee: “In order to know and understand where one power ends [executive power] and another begins [congressional war powers] in any context, we need to have a certain amount of information and an adequate amount of information was not shared with us.” pic.twitter.com/I1SAwowWO3— Resistbot (@resistbot) January 12, 2020
Congress has but one recourse in a situation like this: impeach (again).
Want to see the most recent statements your Senators have made on impeachment? Resistbot has you covered. Send the word impeach to the bot on Facebook Messenger, Telegram, or as a Twitter direct message. If none of those work for you, Resistbot also supports old fashioned SMS: text impeach to 50409 to get started. It takes 2 minutes to be heard. 🤖👊