1. United States
  2. Kan.
  3. Letter

Concern About Rhetoric and U.S. Interests Regarding Greenland

To: Sen. Marshall, Sen. Moran, Rep. Schmidt

From: A constituent in Basehor, KS

January 25

I am writing as a constituent who believes strongly in American leadership, national security, and a serious, credible foreign policy. For that reason, I am concerned about the recent public rhetoric regarding Greenland. Greenland is a self-governing territory within the Kingdom of Denmark — a NATO ally and long-standing U.S. partner. Public statements suggesting that the United States should “take” or “own” Greenland, whether through pressure, tariffs, or implied force, are not only unrealistic but counterproductive to American interests. Conservatives have long understood that strength abroad depends on credibility and restraint, not impulsive rhetoric. The United States already maintains a strategic presence in Greenland through agreements that protect our military and Arctic security interests. Undermining those arrangements by publicly questioning sovereignty or threatening allies does not make us stronger — it signals instability and weakens trust with partners we rely on to counter Russia and China. This is not about being timid. It is about being serious. A strong America does not threaten friendly nations to score political points, nor does it blur the line between negotiation and coercion. The rule of law, respect for sovereignty, and alliance cohesion are force multipliers — and conservatives used to know that. I support thoughtful engagement on Arctic security, critical minerals, and emerging sea routes, and I believe Congress has a role in ensuring those discussions are grounded in diplomacy, treaty obligations, and clear strategic objectives. What concerns me is rhetoric that creates unnecessary diplomatic crises while distracting from real security priorities. I urge you to support congressional oversight and a clear, disciplined U.S. policy that reinforces alliances, respects sovereignty, and advances American security without reckless escalation. I would appreciate hearing your perspective on how Congress can help restore seriousness and stability to U.S. foreign policy in this area.

Share on BlueskyShare on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on WhatsAppShare on TumblrEmail with GmailEmail

Write to Roger W. Marshall or any of your elected officials

Send your own letter

Resistbot is a chatbot that delivers your texts to your elected officials by email, fax, or postal mail. Tap above to give it a try or learn more here!