1. United States
2. Letter

The US presidential election has been marred by concerning reports of interference and irregularities that warrant a comprehensive forensic audit to ensure the integrity of the results. Verified instances of bomb threats linked to Russian sources, high rates of rejected mail-in ballots, and potential vulnerabilities in voting systems software raise legitimate questions about whether the outcome accurately reflects the will of the people. A forensic audit would involve a thorough examination of every aspect of the election process, including a verification of rejected ballots, digital security analysis for signs of tampering, and a comparison of electronic and paper records. This level of scrutiny is crucial to identify any errors or manipulation that could have impacted the final tally. Precedents from other democracies, such as France, Germany, and Brazil, demonstrate that swift action to investigate credible concerns is a standard practice for protecting electoral integrity. When faced with even minor irregularities, these nations conduct forensic audits to restore public trust in the democratic process. The urgency of this situation cannot be overstated. Failure to address these issues through a transparent and comprehensive audit could undermine faith in the electoral system and sow further division. A forensic audit is not about challenging the results but about ensuring that every legitimate vote was counted and that any interference, foreign or domestic, is brought to light and addressed. The integrity of American democracy hinges on a commitment to transparency and accountability. A forensic audit is a crucial step in upholding these principles and ensuring that the will of the people is accurately reflected in the election outcome.