- United States
- Texas
- Letter
Reject Gaetz as Attorney General for Ethical Lapses
To: Sen. Cornyn, Sen. Cruz
From: A verified voter in Houston, TX
November 14
The president-elect's nomination of Representative Matt Gaetz for attorney general has raised significant concerns across the political spectrum. As a key figure overseeing federal law enforcement and the administration of justice, the attorney general must possess unimpeachable integrity and a steadfast commitment to upholding the rule of law without regard for partisan interests. However, Gaetz's past conduct and inflammatory rhetoric call into question his ability to lead the Department of Justice with the impartiality and judiciousness that this critical role demands. The ethics investigation into Gaetz's alleged misconduct, including potential violations of federal sex trafficking laws, casts a pall over his fitness for this position of public trust. While he was never charged, the mere existence of such a high-profile inquiry undermines the public's confidence in his ability to oversee federal prosecutions objectively and without conflicts of interest. Moreover, his confrontational stance toward the FBI and Justice Department, accusing them of being "weaponized" against the president's allies, suggests a willingness to politicize law enforcement in service of a partisan agenda. Confirming Gaetz would send a troubling message about the prioritization of loyalty over competence and integrity in a role designed as a check against abuses of executive power. The attorney general must be a staunch defender of democratic institutions, not an instrument for undermining them or settling political scores. For the sake of preserving public faith in the fair administration of justice, I urge you to carefully scrutinize Gaetz's record and qualifications. The American people deserve an attorney general beyond reproach, not one dogged by ethical clouds and accusations of impropriety. Upholding the rule of law demands an attorney general committed to equal justice under the law, not advancing a partisan political agenda.