1. United States
2. Wisc.
3. Letter

The use of encrypted messaging apps like Signal by White House staff and Cabinet officials to discuss sensitive military operations raises serious concerns about transparency and accountability. While there may be legitimate reasons for protecting certain communications, the public has a right to understand the decision-making processes around issues of national security. An investigation is warranted to ensure proper protocols are being followed and that there are no violations of information security policies. Such an inquiry should examine if any classified or operationally sensitive details were improperly shared on these chats. Additionally, it should assess whether the inclusion of individuals without proper clearances on these discussions posed risks. The American people deserve assurances that military planning is being conducted through formal, established channels with appropriate oversight. Ultimately, this situation underscores the need for clear guidelines and training on the use of new communication technologies by government personnel. Public trust in our national security apparatus depends on it operating with the highest levels of professionalism and adherence to well-defined procedures. A thorough and impartial investigation can help uphold those standards.