1. United States
2. Wash.
3. Letter

The offer to allow federal employees to submit deferred resignations carries severe risks of disruptions to critical government functions and public services that Americans rely on. Undercutting the federal workforce in such a haphazard manner, without a coherent transition strategy, is irresponsible from a public policy standpoint. Key government roles across agencies could be left unstaffed, crippling the ability to carry out essential responsibilities. Rather than a blanket call for resignations, a more prudent approach would be to pursue targeted, studied workforce reductions in line with clearly articulated policy priorities and organizational needs. Rushed attrition could irreparably damage the government's capacity to fulfill its duties to citizens. I urge you to reconsider this disruptive proposal and instead engage in systematic workforce planning to uphold the continuity of vital public services. The deferred resignation offer lacks clarity on legal authorities and appears to conflict with existing employment laws around administrative leave and resignation withdrawals. Pushing forward with this legally dubious plan invites judicial challenges and uncertainty for the dedicated public servants who power the operations of our government. Responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars and respect for the law demand a more carefully crafted human resources strategy.