1. United States
2. Iowa
3. Letter

The No Rogue Rulings Act of 2025 (NORRA) would severely hamper the ability of federal district courts to provide injunctive relief on a nationwide basis. This legislation aims to restrict injunctions to only apply to the parties directly involved in a case, preventing broader nationwide injunctions against executive branch actions. While the bill allows for a three-judge panel to issue injunctions in cases brought by multiple states challenging executive actions, this exception is narrow. The proposed restrictions undermine the judiciary's crucial role in checking executive overreach and safeguarding constitutional rights. Nationwide injunctions have been vital tools for swiftly halting unlawful policies that cause widespread harm before they take effect. Removing this authority from district courts threatens to enable unconstitutional executive actions to remain in force for extended periods, jeopardizing the rights and well-being of millions. Furthermore, the bill's randomized selection process for three-judge panels raises concerns about potential politicization and inconsistent rulings across circuits. A fair and independent judiciary is a cornerstone of our democracy, and measures that risk compromising its impartiality should be stringently opposed. In light of these grave concerns over the erosion of judicial authority and potential for unchecked executive overreach, I urge you to vote against the NORRA of 2025. Preserving the ability of district courts to provide timely and nationwide injunctive relief is crucial for safeguarding the rule of law and protecting the constitutional rights of all Americans.