1. United States
2. Texas
3. Letter

I am writing to formally register my opposition to current ICE enforcement practices that, in my view, violate constitutional safeguards and undermine public trust. What I Am Seeing - Aggressive residential operations lacking meaningful judicial oversight. - Agents operating with obscured identification and limited transparency. - Expanded detention capacity despite documented humanitarian and due-process concerns. - Escalating use of force that has resulted in community trauma and national protest. These developments are not abstract policy disputes. They raise serious Fourth and Fifth Amendment concerns and reflect a pattern of enforcement untethered from clear constitutional boundaries. What Is At Stake The legitimacy of federal law enforcement depends on restraint, accountability, and adherence to the rule of law. Immigration policy can be debated vigorously. Constitutional compliance cannot. When communities perceive that federal agents are empowered to bypass warrants, disregard court scrutiny, or operate without transparency, trust in government deteriorates. That erosion harms public safety and democratic stability alike. What I Am Asking You To Do 1. Publicly affirm that judicial warrants are required for residential entries. 2. Support statutory guardrails on use of force and mandatory de-escalation standards. 3. Require visible identification, body cameras, and transparent reporting for all enforcement operations. 4. Condition funding on measurable constitutional compliance and independent oversight. This is not a partisan appeal. It is a constitutional one. As your constituent, I expect leadership that protects both border policy interests and civil liberties. I ask you to state clearly where you stand and what legislative steps you will take to ensure ICE operates within lawful limits.