1. United States
2. Calif.
3. Letter

The U.S. presidential election has been overshadowed by reports of potential interference and irregularities, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive forensic audit to safeguard the integrity of the results. Verified incidents, including bomb threats linked to Russian sources, high rates of rejected mail-in ballots, and possible vulnerabilities in voting system software, have raised serious concerns about whether the outcome truly reflects the will of the voters. A forensic audit would involve a meticulous examination of the election process, encompassing the verification of rejected ballots, digital security analysis to detect tampering, and a cross-check of electronic and paper records. Such scrutiny is essential to identify any errors or manipulation that may have influenced the final results. Other democracies, including France, Germany, and Brazil, routinely conduct forensic audits to address credible concerns, demonstrating that swift action is standard practice for preserving electoral integrity. Even minor irregularities in these countries prompt thorough investigations to restore public trust. This issue requires immediate attention. Ignoring these concerns through inaction risks eroding public confidence in the electoral system and deepening divisions. A forensic audit is not about disputing the results but about ensuring every valid vote was counted and addressing any foreign or domestic interference. The strength of American democracy depends on transparency and accountability. Conducting a forensic audit is a critical step in upholding these principles and confirming that the election outcome truly reflects the will of the people.