1. United States
2. Texas
3. Letter

I’m writing to you as a concerned constituent and citizen about the U.S. Army’s new grooming policy set to roll out in the coming weeks. According to Military.com, this guidance would revoke permanent shaving waivers, require formal treatment plans for chronic shaving-related skin conditions, and—most alarmingly—allow soldiers to be separated if they need shaving exemptions for more than 12 months within a two‑year period . What’s profoundly disturbing is that this policy disproportionately impacts Black men. Up to 60% of Black men are affected by pseudofolliculitis barbae (PFB)—a painful, genetic condition caused by ingrown hairs . A senior NCO told Military.com bluntly, “Of course, this is racially motivated…There’s no tactical reason; you can look professional with facial hair.” . Another active-duty Solider echoed this outrage calling it “bigotry in action,” adding clearly: “This policy … is targeting black male troops.” This isn’t just unfair—it weakens our military and undermines equality. Black Americans make up roughly 14% of the U.S. population but represent around 25% of Army recruits. Forcing those with a non‑combat medical condition to leave makes the Army less diverse—and frankly, less ready. Losing experienced, capable soldiers over something as arbitrary as genetics doesn’t strengthen readiness—it hollows it out. Congress has a responsibility to step in when Defense Department policies have a clear discriminatory effect. Specifically, I urge you to: 1. Push for a pause on enforcement of this policy until a full racial-impact assessment is completed. 2. Demand clear proof that banning clean-shaven waivers serves a legitimate, battlefield-related need. 3. Require equitable accommodations—such as allowing well-groomed beards—as alternatives to separation. This policy isn’t about discipline or safety. As one dermatologist told the Independent, it “has nothing to do with readiness…On its face, it’s a racist policy” And as service members have know for decades shaving waivers are a medical accommodation—not a performance issue . I ask you to stand up for fairness, military readiness, and justice. Please use your office to halt this policy and ensure the Army can meet grooming standards in a way that doesn’t sacrifice talented, loyal soldiers or target one community.