1. United States
  2. Colo.
  3. Letter

The Dangers of a Reactive FDA: America Needs a Proactive Approach to Food Safety

To: Sen. Bennet, Rep. Crank, Sen. Hickenlooper

From: A verified voter in Colorado Springs, CO

March 6, 2025

The current approach of the FDA is reactive rather than protective, putting Americans at risk. Instead of proactively ensuring the safety and health of consumers, the FDA often waits until health issues arise before addressing them. This is a dangerous and inefficient way to manage food safety, especially as new products and chemicals are introduced into the market at a rapid pace. A reactive FDA means harmful substances can remain in the food supply for years before any action is taken. For example, additives, pesticides, and chemicals that have not been thoroughly tested for long-term safety are often approved without sufficient scrutiny. This leads to a situation where Americans are exposed to potential risks until incidents or widespread health problems force the FDA to act—by which point the damage may have already been done. In contrast, European food safety agencies, such as the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), have a more precautionary approach. These agencies take a proactive stance, requiring thorough, independent testing and rigorous evaluations before new food ingredients, additives, or pesticides are approved for use. The precautionary principle in Europe means that if there is scientific uncertainty about the safety of a product, it is more likely to be restricted or banned rather than allowed to enter the market until proven harmful. This proactive stance better protects consumers and prioritizes public health over corporate interests. The FDA's reactive approach also contrasts with the way European countries handle recalls and safety warnings. In Europe, when a food product is deemed dangerous, the recall process is swift and thorough, with clear communication to the public. In contrast, the FDA often struggles with timely and transparent information when it comes to recalls or warning consumers about potential health risks. The differences between the FDA and European agencies highlight a critical issue: the need for a stronger, more protective food safety system in the U.S. Americans deserve the same level of vigilance, transparency, and proactive measures that European consumers receive. It’s time for the FDA to adopt a more protective, preventative approach to food safety to ensure the health and well-being of the American people.

Share on BlueskyShare on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on WhatsAppShare on TumblrEmail with GmailEmail

Write to Michael F. Bennet or any of your elected officials

Send your own letter

Or text write to 50409

Resistbot is a chatbot that delivers your texts to your elected officials by email, fax, or postal mail. Tap above to give it a try or learn more here!