1. United States
2. Letter

Strategic clarity determines whether your immigration mandate transforms America or becomes a casualty of its own unforced errors. The moment demands ruthless prioritization. Your opponents understand what many of your advisors seem not to: perception management in this crisis is as consequential as operational execution. The tragedy in Minneapolis—regardless of the circumstances or justifications—has created an opening for your adversaries to reframe enforcement as chaos rather than competence. Here lies your opportunity: shift the battleground to terrain where you win decisively without the media amplification that feeds their narrative. **Prioritize Red and Purple States Strategically** Concentrate enforcement resources where enforcement directly strengthens your political coalition. Red states experiencing labor displacement, public service strain, and economic disruption from illegal immigration are your natural constituency—yet many remain insufficiently engaged in cooperation. Purple states with Republican governors, agricultural interests, and manufacturing hubs are pivotal for 2026 midterms. These jurisdictions generate enforcement wins with local government cooperation, regional business support, and far less media intensity than operations in sanctuary cities governed by your political opponents. You secure compliance through incentive and partnership rather than confrontation. Local law enforcement becomes your ally rather than your obstacle. **Let Blue Cities Expose Their Own Contradictions** Your strongest political weapon in sanctuary cities is restraint, not escalation. When you operate in Minneapolis, Los Angeles, or Chicago at scale, you gift your opponents footage, martyrs, and the moral high ground they desperately need. They become the censors of federal law; you become the enforcer of property damage and fear. Instead, allow their defiance to metastasize. Document it. Publicize their refusal to cooperate with federal law. Let voters in those cities experience the consequences of their leaders' choices—rising crime correlating with non-cooperation, public resources diverted to undocumented populations, economic decline—without appearing to be the architect of the pain. Cut their federal funding through courts and Congress where you can win decisively. Let judges rule on the merits. Let voters in those cities decide whether their leaders' sanctuary policies are worth the cost. **The Midterm Calculus** Renee Good's death created a temporary opening for your enemies to delegitimize your entire immigration agenda. Do not hand them additional footage. Shift operations to cooperative jurisdictions, win visibly there, and let that success speak louder than confrontational scenes from blue cities. The Americans most responsive to your immigration message are in Georgia, Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina—and in the agricultural belts of the Midwest where population replacement threatens communities. Enforce vigorously where local government cooperates. Build political capital through orderly operations and community support. Your 2026 majority depends on demonstrating competence, not drama. Competence means working with Republican governors and sheriffs, not battling Democratic mayors with ICE raids that generate sympathetic narratives. **The Strategic Imperative** You have the mandate. You have the resources. You have overwhelming public support for deporting criminal aliens and removing those who openly defy federal law. You do not need to fight blue cities to achieve your agenda—you need to succeed spectacularly in red and purple ones. Let sanctuary cities be the warning for Americans in cooperative jurisdictions about what failure and lawlessness produces. Do not be their opponent. Be their alternative. Your movement was built on winning through superior strategy, not through confrontation for its own sake. Apply that principle now. History will judge whether your immigration enforcement strengthened the nation or consumed it through endless cultural battles. Choose the former.