1. United States
2. Texas
3. Letter

Dear Senator/Representative, The Constitution does not contain an asterisk. It does not condition due process, freedom from unreasonable searches, or protection from excessive force on immigration status. Yet recent actions by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement suggest that these limits are increasingly treated as optional. Across the country, ICE operations have drawn national attention for aggressive tactics that would be unacceptable in any other law-enforcement context: armed raids conducted without judicial warrants, agents operating with obscured identities, and the escalating use of force in residential neighborhoods. Federal courts, journalists, and civil-rights organizations have all raised alarms that these practices push well beyond lawful authority and into routine constitutional violations. At the same time, Congress continues to appropriate billions of dollars to ICE with insufficient conditions, oversight, or transparency. This disconnect is deeply troubling. When an agency demonstrates repeated disregard for constitutional limits, continued funding without reform becomes complicity rather than governance. As your constituent, I want clear answers: • What steps are you taking to ensure ICE complies with the Fourth and Fifth Amendments? • Do you support prohibiting home entries without judicial warrants? • Will you back independent investigations and enforceable consequences for agents who violate civil rights? • Will you oppose further expansion of detention facilities until basic legal and humanitarian standards are met? Public trust in government depends on accountability. Allowing a federal agency to operate behind secrecy, immunity, and fear erodes that trust and damages the legitimacy of the rule of law itself. Immigration enforcement can exist without brutality; border policy can be debated without abandoning constitutional principles. I am asking you—directly and unequivocally—to oppose unconstitutional ICE practices and to support concrete legislative reforms that restore lawful limits, transparency, and accountability. Silence or inaction is no longer defensible.