1. United States
2. Ohio
3. Letter

I am writing as a registered voter in Ohio and someone who expects earnest representation, not dismissive boilerplate replies. When I reach out with substantive concerns, I deserve more than a generic response. Constituent engagement must be specific, thoughtful, and responsive — not a shield against accountability. I am deeply troubled by the federal government’s handling of two critical issues: 1. Trade and Tariff Policy The recent reinstatement and increase of global tariffs — after previous legal challenges — has significant consequences for consumers. When duties rise, Americans pay those costs at the register. I expect clear, transparent reasoning for policy decisions that directly affect household finances, and concrete answers when citizens ask pointed questions about their rationale. 2. Transparency in Epstein-Related Investigations and Prosecutions The extensive release of files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein has rightfully raised questions about the completeness and openness of the process. The U.S. House overwhelmingly approved a resolution to make unredacted investigative materials public, with a 427-to-1 vote, underscoring broad support for transparency. Despite this broad support and years of public demand, significant portions of these records remain partially redacted. Too many aspects of this investigation still lack clarity and full disclosure, and this undermines public confidence in our institutions. As an Ohio constituent, I expect you to advocate for complete accountability, not obfuscation. The perception that political leaders protect powerful interests — especially in cases involving exploitation and harm to vulnerable individuals — is corrosive. I urge you to use your position to: • Support full, unredacted public access to all legally releasable Epstein-related records. • Call for robust, impartial review of any individuals associated with documented wrongdoing. • Engage with constituents’ concerns directly and substantively, rather than through generic correspondence. If these priorities are not aligned with your policy positions, then please state so explicitly and explain your rationale — particularly when it comes to defending public trust and transparency.