1. United States
2. Mo.
3. Letter

I am writing to ask a direct and serious question: why has Congress not moved to hold Pam Bondi in contempt of Congress? For months, she has continued to ignore lawful transparency requirements related to the Epstein records. Congressional requests and public accountability measures are not optional suggestions — they are legal obligations. When an official refuses compliance, Congress has both the authority and the duty to act. Failure to enforce that authority signals that the law applies differently depending on who you are. At the same time, both Pam Bondi and Kash Patel have made sworn statements that appear to contradict documented facts already available to the public. If ordinary citizens provided false testimony under oath, they would face investigation immediately. Yet here, there has been no meaningful enforcement. Perjury and obstruction cannot be treated as political disagreements — they are crimes. Every day this is ignored weakens public trust and damages the credibility of Congress itself. Oversight only matters if it is enforced. If Congress refuses to act when its own subpoenas and legal standards are disregarded, then oversight becomes theater rather than law. I am asking you clearly: Will you support contempt proceedings and a formal investigation into potential perjury and obstruction — or will this be allowed to continue without consequence? Your constituents deserve to know whether the rule of law still applies equally to government officials. I expect a clear answer.