Reconsider censorship risks of "harmful to minors" definition

This bill, SB1298, requires commercial entities that publish material considered "harmful to minors" to verify that anyone accessing their site is 18 or older if more than one-third of the website's content falls into this category. The overly broad definition of "harmful to minors" raises concerns about censorship of important educational and cultural content pertaining to LGBTQ+ issues. Requiring age verification for one-third of a website's content could inadvertently restrict access to valuable resources and narratives, stifling free expression. The potential for misuse targeting LGBTQ+ perspectives is worrisome. Rather than preemptive censorship, a more balanced approach emphasizing age-appropriate guidance and parental involvement would better serve minors while upholding free speech principles. This legislation should be reconsidered to prevent unintended consequences that marginalize already vulnerable communities.