Reinstate 18F tech talent for efficient government services

The abrupt termination of all 18F staff without allowing for an orderly transition is detrimental to government efficiency and wasteful of taxpayer funds. 18F has a proven track record of successful projects that streamline government services and technology across federal agencies. Their work has saved costs while making processes more user-friendly for the American public. Dismantling this skilled team means critical initiatives at agencies like NOAA, State Department, and IRS now face disruption. Abandoning 18F's expertise is counterproductive and will likely lead to project delays, increased costs from lack of institutional knowledge transfer, and subpar service delivery. This rash action directly undermines claims of enhancing government performance. 18F represented the best practices in digital service delivery. Their elimination is a step backwards that jeopardizes efforts to modernize outdated legacy systems and improve digital accessibility. Reinvesting in this civic tech talent pool would allow resumption of 18F's invaluable work optimizing technology for efficient service to all Americans. A reasoned approach focused on seamless operations should be the priority.