Concerns Regarding Press Freedom and Proposed Renaming of the Gulf

I am writing to express my deep concern over recent actions by the administration that appear to contradict the principles of free speech and fiscal responsibility. While Vice President J.D. Vance has voiced apprehensions about the state of free speech in Europe, stating, “Free speech, I fear, is in retreat in Europe,” it is troubling to observe similar challenges emerging within our own nation. Recently, the White House barred Associated Press (AP) journalists from covering events in the Oval Office and traveling aboard Air Force One due to the AP’s adherence to the traditional name “Gulf of Mexico” instead of the administration’s preferred “Gulf of America.” This action raises significant First Amendment concerns, as it appears to penalize a reputable news organization for maintaining editorial independence. The Gulf of Mexico has been recognized by this name for over 400 years, reflecting its rich history and the shared heritage of the bordering nations: the United States, Mexico, and Cuba. Each country exercises jurisdiction over portions of the Gulf through established maritime boundaries, with the U.S. managing its territorial sea up to 12 nautical miles from the baseline and an exclusive economic zone (EEZ) extending up to 200 nautical miles. Proposals to rename the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America could impose substantial costs on taxpayers. Potential expenses include: • Educational Materials: Updating textbooks, atlases, and digital resources across educational institutions nationwide. • Government and Administrative Updates: Revising maps, charts, and official documents across federal, state, and local agencies. • Cartography and Mapping Services: Amending paper maps, GPS systems, and online platforms. • Signage and Public Infrastructure: Replacing road signs, tourism information, and public displays in coastal states. • Private Sector Costs: Businesses updating branding, marketing materials, contracts, and legal documents. Estimates suggest that these changes could cost taxpayers over $1 billion. In light of these concerns, I urge you to: 1. Defend Press Freedom: Advocate against actions that undermine journalistic independence and the First Amendment. 2. Promote Fiscal Responsibility: Consider the financial implications of renaming a historically significant geographical feature and prioritize the prudent use of taxpayer funds. Thank you for your attention to these pressing issues. I look forward to your response and to seeing steps taken to uphold the values that define our nation.