I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed bill to mint 400,000 silver dollar coins featuring Charlie Kirk's likeness. While the loss of any life is tragic, I believe this proposal is an inappropriate use of our national currency and sets a concerning precedent.
The U.S. currency has historically featured figures of national importance who have made significant, long-lasting contributions to our country's development and values. Charlie Kirk, regardless of his impact on conservative activism, does not meet this high standard. At the time of minting, he would be the youngest American ever featured on U.S. currency, which raises questions about the criteria being used for such an honor.
Furthermore, the phrase "well done, good and faithful servant" proposed for the coin carries religious connotations that are inappropriate for government-issued currency. This violates the principle of separation of church and state that is fundamental to our democracy.
I am concerned that this proposal, along with other efforts like congressional medals, a day of remembrance, and a potential statue at the U.S. Capitol, represents an overreach in commemorating a controversial political figure. These actions risk politicizing our national symbols and institutions.
I urge you to vote against this bill and any similar proposals. Instead, I encourage focusing on legislation that addresses the pressing needs of all Americans, rather than divisive symbolic gestures. Our currency should remain a unifying symbol of our shared national heritage, not a platform for contemporary political figures.
Thank you for your consideration of this important matter. I look forward to hearing your stance on this issue and how you plan to vote if this bill comes before Congress.