Protect Great Lakes: Rigorous Line 5 tunnel review required

The potential designation of the Line 5 tunnel project as an "emergency" by the Army Corps of Engineers raises significant concerns. Rushing this risky pipeline project under the guise of a national energy emergency would be dangerous and irresponsible. A thorough, transparent process that prioritizes safety and environmental protection should be followed, not shortcuts driven by political agendas. The 72-year-old Line 5 pipeline, which transports Canadian petroleum products across the Straits of Mackinac, poses a grave threat to the Great Lakes. A rupture could devastate the ecosystem and economies that rely on these precious waters. While the proposed tunnel aims to mitigate risks, the project itself is controversial, and its environmental impact should be rigorously evaluated. Moreover, granting emergency status to facilitate fossil fuel infrastructure runs counter to global efforts to address the climate crisis. As we transition towards renewable energy sources, we must prioritize sustainable solutions that safeguard our planet's future. I urge you to ensure that the Line 5 tunnel project undergoes a comprehensive and rigorous review process, without any emergency designations that could compromise thorough evaluation. The health of the Great Lakes and our commitment to environmental stewardship demand nothing less.