An open letter to the U.S. Congress

WILL YOU ACCEPT THE PRESIDENTIAL ASSAULT ON THE JUDICIARY?

1 so far! Help us get to 5 signers!

“[A]ll Venezuelan citizens 14 years of age or older who are members of TdA, are within the United States, and are not actually naturalized or lawful permanent residents of the United States are liable to be apprehended, restrained, secured, and removed as Alien Enemies.” As asked previously, are we at war with Venezuela? And why, instead of sending Venezuelan citizens back to their home country, they were sent to a prison in El Salvador where they will be maintained on the U.S. taxpayers’ dime? Did you know, approve, or assist with any of these actions by the Trump administration? How, when, and by whom were these men determined to be Tren de Aragua gang members? Was it, as some reporting suggests, simply because they had tattoos? Reports are coming out that refutes a blanket designation of gang membership in all cases. We have no idea of the reality. A federal judge called foul on the deportation actions. The administration ignored his order to turn the planes around. Trump took to social media to call [Judge] Boasberg a “Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator who was sadly appointed by Barack Hussein Obama, was not elected President—He didn’t WIN the popular VOTE (by a lot!), he didn’t WIN ALL SEVEN SWING STATES, he didn’t WIN 2,750 to 525 Counties, HE DIDN’T WIN ANYTHING! I WON FOR MANY REASONS, IN AN OVERWHELMING MANDATE, BUT FIGHTING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION MAY HAVE BEEN THE NUMBER ONE REASON FOR THIS HISTORIC VICTORY. I’m just doing what the VOTERS wanted me to do. This judge, like many of the Crooked Judges’ I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!” Then pushback from SCOTUS Roberts: “For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose.” Further from ex-federal judge J. Michael Luttig: “When the president of the United States wages a war on the rule of law and the federal judiciary alley, America is in a constitutional crisis. The constitutional role of the president is to faithfully execute the laws.” “Needless to say, the president is doing anything but that at the moment. Most constitutional scholars have long agreed that a constitutional crisis exists at least when the president defies a court order. That’s essentially what the president is doing today and what it appears he intends to do in the future.” “Never before has an American president even thought to utter one single one of the words against the federal judiciary that this president has uttered every day.” He said judges were “unshaken in their resolve to honor their oath to the constitution. It’s the president who has wanted this war ever since his first term in office. Well, he’s going to get what he wanted.” Which side of this are you on?

▶ Created on March 19 by Debbie

Sign Petition

Already signed?

  • Promote this campaign to get it texted to potential signers
  • Share this page or image
    A shareable card that reads "tell the U.S. Congress: WILL YOU ACCEPT THE PRESIDENTIAL ASSAULT ON THE JUDICIARY?" followed by "text sign PSYHZV to 50409"
  • Text INVITE PSYHZV to ask your friends to sign via text or email
  • and post around campus or on your community bulletin board
  • Use the iOS app to share with your contacts
  • Join our Discord and connect with fellow organizers
  • Upgrade to Premium to unlock more features and make sure we can keep delivering
Share on BlueskyShare on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on WhatsAppShare on TumblrEmail with GmailEmail

Fund texts of this petition

Drive more letter deliveries by funding text appeals to users. Become a member to double your reach per dollar.