Reject Eric Tung 9th Circuit Judicial Nominee

The nomination of Eric Tung to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals raises serious concerns about conflicts of interest and lack of impartiality on issues related to crypto and digital assets. As counsel, Tung has repeatedly advocated for lessening regulations and oversight on the crypto industry, which could directly benefit President Trump's vast personal crypto holdings worth an estimated $2.9 billion. The 9th Circuit has jurisdiction over Silicon Valley and frequently hears cases involving emerging technologies like cryptocurrency. Appointing a judge with extensive ties to the crypto industry and a documented record of arguing against consumer protections raises legitimate fears that Tung would rule in favor of the President's financial interests rather than upholding the law impartially. This apparent conflict of interest undermines faith in an independent judiciary and the integrity of the legal system. To preserve judicial ethics and rebuild public trust, Tung's nomination should be rejected. Qualified nominees must be vetted thoroughly to identify potential conflicts and ensure their rulings will be guided solely by the Constitution and the rule of law rather than personal or political agendas.