1. United States
2. Mich.
3. Letter

I am deeply concerned about the Supreme Court's recent hearing on Colorado's ban on conversion therapy for LGBTQ youth. As your constituent, I urge you to take a strong stance in support of maintaining and strengthening such bans nationwide. Conversion therapy is not just ineffective; it is a form of torture that causes lasting harm to LGBTQ youth. This practice has been widely discredited by reputable medical organizations. The American Psychological Association, American Medical Association, and American Academy of Pediatrics all oppose conversion therapy due to its potential to inflict severe emotional and psychological damage. The case brought by Kaley Chiles, a Christian therapist claiming First Amendment violations, threatens to undermine crucial protections for vulnerable young people. While free speech is vital, it should not supersede the state's duty to protect minors from harmful pseudoscientific practices. The 2019 Colorado law, along with similar bans in over 20 other states, represents a necessary safeguard for LGBTQ youth. I am alarmed by reports that some conservative justices seemed skeptical of the ban, suggesting it may constitute viewpoint discrimination. This perspective fails to recognize the critical distinction between protected speech and regulated healthcare practices. Allowing conversion therapy under the guise of free speech would set a dangerous precedent, potentially jeopardizing other essential healthcare regulations. The implications of this case extend far beyond Colorado. A ruling against the ban could have devastating consequences nationwide, leaving LGBTQ youth vulnerable to discredited and harmful practices. It's crucial to remember that this is not a matter of religious freedom or free speech, but of protecting children from psychological abuse. I implore you to use your position to advocate for the rights and well-being of LGBTQ youth. Please speak out in support of conversion therapy bans and work to ensure that any legislation or judicial decisions prioritize the mental health and safety of young people over misguided claims of speech infringement. The lives and futures of countless LGBTQ youth depend on maintaining these vital protections.