1. United States
2. Mich.
3. Letter

A February 3 federal court ruling in Dickinson v. Trump (Case No. 3:25-cv-2170-SI) describes deeply troubling conduct by federal agents in Oregon. According to the court, agents repeatedly responded to peaceful protesters with weapons. Those harmed included children, senior citizens, journalists, medics, and bystanders. The Department of Homeland Security appears to be labeling ordinary demonstrations as “riots,” then using that label to justify escalating force. This pattern raises serious concerns about proportionality, restraint, and respect for constitutional rights. As U.S. District Judge Michael H. Simon wrote, “In a well-functioning constitutional democratic republic, free speech, courageous newsgathering, and nonviolent protest are permitted, respected, and even celebrated.” He contrasted this with authoritarian regimes, where such rights are suppressed rather than protected. The court further noted that statements by DHS officials and senior federal executives reflect an agency culture that celebrates violent responses instead of fair and diplomatic ones. That finding should alarm anyone who values the rule of law. Unchecked use of force against civilians erodes public trust, endangers lives, and undermines the constitutional freedoms the federal government is sworn to defend. Congress must demand accountability, transparency, and an immediate end to the misuse of federal power against lawful protest.