1. United States
2. Mich.
3. Letter

I am writing to demand that you fiercely defend the absolute independence and territorial sovereignty of the United States Armed Forces by striking down Section 224 and Section 622 from the final passage of the Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The United States military is an apolitical defense force bound by the U.S. Constitution to serve the American people. It must never have its core infrastructure, supply chains, or command systems intertwined with a foreign nation. While proponents claim these measures merely streamline alliance logistics, defense analysts and constitutional watchdogs warn that they represent an unprecedented, structural merger of the U.S. and Israeli military-industrial complexes that severely compromises our nation's independent authority. I urge you to oppose this systemic entanglement based on the following critical, sourced grounds: 1. Loss of Strategic Sovereignty and Supply Chain Autonomy (Section 224) Originating from the bicameral U.S.-Israel FUTURES Act of 2026 (H.R. 7540 / S.3855, sponsored by Rep. Ronny Jackson and Sen. Ted Budd), Section 224 mandates the rapid transition and integration of foreign, Israeli-origin technologies directly into U.S. military "programs of record." Forcing the Pentagon to build its core, next-generation infrastructure around foreign components establishes a permanent, structural dependency. This permanently compromises our independent defense supply chains, making our military structurally reliant on foreign manufacturing and intellectual property. IMEU Policy Project+ 1 2. Dangerous Network and Intelligence Integration Section 224 explicitly authorizes deep "network integration" and "data fusion" between the U.S. military and a foreign state across highly sensitive operational domains, including Artificial Intelligence (AI), cyber warfare, autonomous weapon systems, and quantum machine learning. Blurring the technical lines between our military's digital networks and those of a foreign government exposes critical U.S. military advantages, operational secrets, and sovereign data systems to foreign systems, bypassing vital constitutional guardrails. A New Policy 3. Stripping of Congressional and Presidential Oversight (Section 622) In tandem with the defense budget, Section 622 strips the executive branch of its sovereign flexibility by weaponizing the National Security Act of 1947. It establishes an aggressive notification regime designed to make it nearly impossible for a sitting U.S. President or Congress to suspend, adjust, or limit intelligence sharing with Israel. This institutional "lock-in" insulates foreign military operations from regular congressional appropriations, democratic oversight, and the changing geopolitical interests of the American public. Arab Center Washington DC 4. Erosion of the Apolitical Defense Mandate By forcing the direct integration of foreign military objectives into the Department of Defense's procurement architecture via a designated Pentagon Executive Agent, this legislation presumes that the national security priorities of the United States and Israel are permanently inseparable. This is factually and morally false. Our military belongs solely to the sovereign citizens of the United States. Forcing an institutional entanglement of this scale reduces our nation's independent leverage, compromises our defensive integrity, and drags American taxpayers into foreign entanglements without clear democratic consent. Arab Center Washington DC+ 1 The United States military is a sovereign defender of the Republic, not a proxy system to be structurally welded to a foreign state. I demand that you preserve our absolute military independence, uphold your oath to the Constitution, and vote to strike Section 224 and Section 622 completely out of the FY 2027 NDAA.