1. United States
2. Maine
3. Letter

As your constituent, I urge you to oppose approval of the Department of Defense’s proposed Fiscal Year (FY) 2027 budget of approximately $1.5 trillion unless and until Congress conducts a full public, line-by-line review of the request. RECONCILIATION SHOULD NOT FAST-TRACK A $1.5 TRILLION DEFENSE BUDGET The proposal combines approximately $1.15 trillion in regular discretionary funding with an additional $350 billion routed through budget reconciliation. Because reconciliation can reduce the normal Senate vote threshold and compress debate, it should not be used to rush a military spending increase of this size. A proposed increase of roughly 42 to 44 percent is highly unusual for an already enormous federal budget category. Because increases of this magnitude are rare, Congress should apply a higher level of scrutiny than would be appropriate for an ordinary annual budget adjustment. TAXPAYERS COULD FACE HIGHER COSTS WHILE DOMESTIC PROGRAMS ARE CUT This increase does not stand alone. The same budget proposal would reduce non-defense discretionary spending by roughly $73 billion, affecting housing assistance, health research, and other domestic priorities. Congress should examine where those reductions would occur and decide whether shifting resources from those programs to military spending serves the nation’s overall interests. Those cuts would cover only a fraction of the proposed military increase. Unless Congress identifies full offsets elsewhere, the remaining cost could increase federal borrowing, raise future interest payments, and leave future Congresses with fewer resources for other national priorities. CONGRESS MUST JUSTIFY AN INCREASE OF THIS SCALE This is not an argument against a strong military. It is an argument for requiring Congress to prove that an increase of this scale is necessary, transparent, and directly tied to real national security needs. A budget increase of this size should be justified program by program, not approved as a single large figure. Congress should require the Department of Defense to show that each proposed increase contributes directly to military readiness, deterrence, or national security. Congress has the constitutional power of the purse and should exercise that responsibility carefully. STEPS CONGRESS SHOULD TAKE NOW (1) REQUIRE FULL REVIEW. Hold the FY 2027 defense budget to the same line-by-line review applied to other agencies rather than allowing the $350 billion reconciliation portion to avoid full scrutiny. (2) IDENTIFY THE TRADEOFFS. Require a public accounting of the domestic programs that would be reduced, and assess whether those cuts are justified before transferring funds to military spending. (3) REQUEST INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS. Request a public review by the Government Accountability Office or the Congressional Budget Office before final votes are taken. Thank you.