1. United States
2. Iowa
3. Letter

The move to make English the sole official language of the United States and review multilingual offerings from federal agencies is concerning. While promoting a shared language can foster unity, mandating English alone disregards the nation's linguistic diversity and disempowers communities with limited English proficiency. Failing to provide key services and information in languages other than English can be discriminatory and hinder access to essential resources like voting materials, emergency alerts, legal proceedings, and tax information. Multilingual access ensures all residents can fully participate in civic life and pursue opportunities. Instead of restricting language assistance, the government should expand efforts to serve its diverse populace effectively. Maintaining robust translation and interpretation services allows for more equitable access while upholding constitutional rights. Language should unite, not divide, the people this administration is sworn to serve. I urge you to protect existing multilingual federal programs and advocate for policies that celebrate America's diversity through inclusive communication. Promoting English acquisition is reasonable, but not at the expense of disenfranchising entire communities. An unwavering commitment to civil rights demands preserving language access.