1. United States
2. Texas
3. Letter

I am your constituent, and I am writing not with polite concern but with outrage and an unyielding demand for action regarding the Epstein files. The American people were promised transparency. Instead, we continue to see delays, redactions, sealed records, and whispers of political caution. Reports have circulated that Attorney General Pam Bondi (chatgpt://generic-entity?number=0) allegedly suggested that prosecuting everyone implicated in the Epstein network would cause “the whole system” to collapse. If that statement was made — or if it reflects the sentiment inside our institutions — it is not an excuse for hesitation. It is a confession of rot. Let us be crystal clear: if pursuing justice against those who exploited, trafficked, or abused children threatens powerful interests, then those interests deserve to fall. Jeffrey Epstein (chatgpt://generic-entity?number=1) did not operate in a vacuum. His trafficking network spanned continents, social circles, and elite institutions. He was connected to billionaires, celebrities, academics, and political figures across party lines. His associate, Ghislaine Maxwell (chatgpt://generic-entity?number=2), is serving a federal sentence — proof that this was not a conspiracy theory, but a criminal enterprise validated in court. Yet thousands — if not millions — of pages of related documents remain withheld, sealed, or heavily redacted. Why? If evidence exists, it must be acted upon. If crimes were committed, charges must follow. If names appear in credible investigative records, they must be scrutinized — regardless of wealth, fame, or political utility. The rule of law does not bend for: • Billionaires • Elected officials • Corporate executives • Foreign royalty • Intelligence-connected individuals • Donors • Celebrities No title, no security clearance, no foundation board seat, and no campaign contribution grants immunity from prosecution. When prosecutions stall because the accused are “too powerful,” that is not prudence — it is corruption. When files are withheld to avoid institutional embarrassment, that is not stability — it is complicity. A justice system that fears accountability for elites is not strong; it is captured. Child sex trafficking is not partisan. It is not ideological. It is not negotiable. Survivors live with permanent trauma while those who may have enabled, funded, or participated in abuse hide behind sealed documents and procedural delays. Every day of inaction communicates that power still outweighs justice in the United States. Congress has oversight authority. Congress controls funding. Congress can subpoena. Congress can compel transparency. Congress can demand full release of all legally releasable Epstein-related records, protect whistleblowers, and ensure the Department of Justice pursues every prosecutable case without favoritism. If our institutions truly would “collapse” under full accountability, then what you are defending is not democracy — it is a protection racket. The American people are watching. Survivors are watching. History will record whether you defended children or protected power. Prosecute everyone found guilty. Release the files. Follow the evidence wherever it leads. No fear. No favoritism. No exceptions.