1. United States
2. Maine
3. Letter

Trump’s 7/16 speech on election security: The Record Behind the Rhetoric  I am writing as a constituent regarding President Trump’s primetime address on July 16, 2026, concerning “election security.” That the administration says it’s concerned about election security is hard to reconcile with actions it has taken that many election officials, courts, and voting-rights organizations say undermine the independence of election administration itself.  The stated focus on foreign interference is especially striking given that Trump has long minimized or disputed well-documented foreign efforts to influence U.S. elections, and in 2016 publicly said “Russia, if you’re listening…” regarding Hillary Clinton’s emails. Claims about protecting election integrity should be judged against the administration’s record, not its rhetoric. Before Congress accepts the administration’s framing of what threatens our elections, I ask that you weigh it against its own actions over the past year: 1 Mid-decade redistricting. In 2025, Trump urged Texas Republicans to redraw congressional maps mid-decade, adding five GOP-leaning House seats before 2026. The Supreme Court allowed the map to stand. Similar efforts followed in Missouri, Indiana, Ohio, and Florida. 2 DOJ voter roll demands. Since May 2025, DOJ has demanded unredacted statewide voter rolls — including driver’s license and partial Social Security numbers — from nearly every state, to cross-reference against federal immigration databases. At least six federal courts have rejected DOJ lawsuits to compel this data. 3 Election Assistance Commission. On July 9, 2026, the White House dismissed the EAC’s remaining commissioners, leaving the only federal agency dedicated to helping states run secure elections without a quorum, months before the midterms. 4 Federal reshaping of election administration. In 2025, Trump called for ending mail voting and changing voting-machine practices by executive action, despite the Constitution assigning election administration to the states under the Elections Clause. Courts have already blocked portions of these actions. 5 The SAVE Act. The administration continues pressing the Senate to pass the SAVE Act, requiring documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote. It remains short of the votes needed to overcome a filibuster. A further concern: White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller has publicly described plans to deputize National Guard units for immigration enforcement and asserted broad presidential authority to deploy troops domestically. With deployments to Democratic-led cities ongoing as the midterms approach, some election law scholars and voting-rights groups have raised concerns about a chilling effect near polling places, though the administration hasn’t stated that as its intent. Given this record, I respectfully ask that you: • Request oversight hearings on DOJ’s voter-data collection and the EAC dismissals • Press for prompt confirmation of new, bipartisan EAC commissioners before November • Reaffirm, through committee action or public statement, that election administration authority rests with the states and Congress, not the executive branch alone • Request formal DOD clarification on the legal authority and limits governing any National Guard deployments near Election Day Election integrity depends on preventing interference and fraud, but also on preserving the independence of the institutions that run our elections. I would appreciate a response outlining your position and any planned actions.