1. United States
2. Mich.
3. Letter

I am writing to urge you to investigate the Department of Homeland Security's recently announced $1 billion blanket purchase agreement with Palantir Technologies and ensure it complies with federal procurement law and constitutional protections against warrantless surveillance. This agreement allows DHS agencies including Customs and Border Protection and Immigration and Customs Enforcement to bypass competitive bidding processes for purchases of up to $1 billion in Palantir commercial software licenses, maintenance, and implementation services. Blanket purchase agreements are intended to streamline routine purchases, not to circumvent competition for billion-dollar contracts that fundamentally shape how federal agencies conduct surveillance operations. This arrangement raises serious questions about whether DHS followed proper procurement procedures designed to ensure taxpayer value and prevent vendor lock-in. Beyond procurement concerns, Palantir's expanding surveillance infrastructure threatens Fourth Amendment protections. The company has built tools like Enhanced Leads Identification and Targeting for Enforcement, which creates maps of potential deportation targets by pulling data from DHS and the Department of Health and Human Services. Palantir also developed ImmigrationOS for ICE, designed to provide near real-time visibility on immigrants. These systems create a massive surveillance dragnet that extends far beyond targeted law enforcement, sweeping up data on citizens and noncitizens alike. The timing of this announcement is particularly troubling. According to Palantir Chief Technology Officer Akash Jain, the five-year agreement was announced amid increased concern both externally and internally around the company's existing work with ICE. Rather than addressing legitimate questions about how this technology is used, Palantir CEO Alex Karp has told employees they must sign nondisclosure agreements to learn more details. I urge you to demand transparency about this contract, investigate whether proper competitive bidding procedures were followed, and ensure that any surveillance technology purchased with taxpayer dollars includes robust safeguards against unconstitutional searches and civil liberties violations. Congress has oversight authority and must exercise it.