1. United States
2. Calif.
3. Letter

I am writing as a longtime California driver to express my strong opposition to the proposed Road Charge Collection Project, which would replace our current per‑gallon fuel tax with a per‑mile fee. I first learned of this initiative through Caltrans outreach materials and public notices, and I am deeply concerned about its unfair economic impact. Many Californians—especially those in suburban and rural areas—depend on their cars to reach work, medical appointments, schools, grocery stores, and other essential services. A mileage‑based fee penalizes those who must drive longer distances and offers no guarantee of better roads or reduced congestion. Instead, it simply layers another tax on top of high gas prices, registration fees, tolls, and other charges. Tracking mileage, whether via in‑vehicle devices or manual logs, will impose significant administrative costs that siphon funds away from actual road repairs and maintenance. It also raises privacy concerns for drivers who will be required to report or have monitored every mile they travel. I respectfully urge you to: Oppose any legislation or pilot program that shifts to a per‑mile charge without a comprehensive, independent cost‑benefit analysis demonstrating clear net benefits; Preserve and strengthen the existing fuel excise tax system, which is transparent, easy to administer, and less invasive; Explore alternative funding mechanisms—such as targeted registration surcharges, incremental toll adjustments, or expanded public‑private partnerships—that do not disproportionately burden those who rely on personal vehicles. California has always led the nation with fair, pragmatic policies. Please stand against this punitive road‑usage tax and champion solutions that maintain and improve our transportation infrastructure without overtaxing hardworking residents. I welcome the opportunity to discuss this further and look forward to your leadership on this critical issue.