1. United States
2. N.Y.
3. Letter

The threat to suspend the constitutional right of habeas corpus raises serious concerns about overreach of executive power and undermining of crucial checks and balances. The writ of habeas corpus protects against unlawful detention and has been a cornerstone of liberty since the founding of our nation. Its suspension would constitute an extreme measure that can only be authorized by Congress in cases of rebellion or invasion directly imperiling public safety, as expressly stated in Article I of the Constitution. Suggestions that this extraordinary step could be taken solely because the administration disagrees with court rulings are deeply troubling. The judicial branch serves as an essential counterweight, ensuring executive actions remain within constitutional bounds. Attempting to circumvent unfavorable rulings through unilateral suspension of habeas corpus would subvert the rule of law and system of co-equal branches of government. Protecting national security is critically important, but curtailing fundamental rights is not a viable solution and risks setting a dangerous precedent. We must uphold cherished constitutional principles even in challenging times. All three branches should operate within their designated roles to preserve our democracy's institutional integrity. Calls for lawful immigration reform deserve thoughtful debate, but not through erosion of due process or intimidation of the judiciary. Responsible governance demands policy grounded in facts and respect for constitutional constraints.